LeadScorerTHE ADVISORY ACQUISITION MODEL
Choose the growth decision you want to sell
A business-growth consultancy sells the ability to make and implement a better commercial decision. The first conversation should therefore concern one decision: which customers to pursue, how to explain an offer, which quotes to follow up, or how to turn repeat demand into a manageable service programme.
The consultancy is the reader of this guide. Its prospects are business owners and operating leaders who may buy positioning, marketing strategy, communication, implementation or business-improvement support. Those are different engagements. A marketing execution brief should not silently become unlimited coaching, and a strategy workshop should not promise a complete campaign.
Start with an owner who can sponsor a change, a repeatable commercial process and a defined first output. Use public research to establish relevance. Confirm the problem and economics with the owner. Research gives you a reason to ask; a conversation establishes whether there is useful work to do.
| Engagement | First useful output | Next commercial step |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning and offer | One buyer, offer and proof map | Paid strategy sprint |
| Lead-to-sale improvement | One enquiry-to-quote process map | Bounded implementation |
| Repeat business and retention | One eligible customer journey | Scoped ongoing support |
| Business-owner advisory | One goal, constraint and action plan | Defined advisory cadence |
PUT IT TO WORK
RESEARCH FINDING 01
Read the business population correctly
At 30 June 2026, ABS counted 2,814,778 actively trading Australian businesses. Of these, 996,203 employed people. The remainder were non-employing. Business totals describe an economic population, not a pool of owners ready to fund external consulting. [S01]
LeadScorer calculation: non-employing businesses account for 64.6% of the total. The 5-19 and 20-199 employee bands together contain 301,237 businesses, or 10.7%. These bands can help organise a research plan, but do not establish affordability, owner dependence or need.
The table uses matching employment-size counts for 2025 and 2026. Each business belongs to one band at each date. Changes include businesses moving between bands as well as entries and exits. A fall or rise in one band must not be interpreted as the success or failure rate of individual firms.
| Employees | June 2025 | June 2026 | Net change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-employing | 1,735,470 | 1,818,575 | +83,105 |
| 1-4 employees | 688,870 | 689,600 | +730 |
| 5-19 employees | 232,129 | 232,912 | +783 |
| 20-199 employees | 67,857 | 68,325 | +468 |
| 200+ employees | 5,322 | 5,366 | +44 |
PUT IT TO WORK
RESEARCH FINDING 02
Separate population growth from viable demand
ABS reports net business growth of 85,130 in 2025-26. The non-employing count increased by 83,105 and the employing count by 2,025. Calculated from those figures, 97.6% of the net increase was in non-employing businesses. That is a composition of net change, not a share of newly founded firms. [S01]
Western Australia recorded 12,248 more businesses, a 4.6% increase, compared with 3.1% nationally. This supports a WA-focused research programme. It does not establish how many Perth employers can buy advisory work. No Perth, employment-size and industry cross-tabulation is supplied in this guide.
An owner can have a busy company and little discretionary cash. Another can have spare capacity and a clear, funded commercial decision. The campaign needs to discover which case it faces. Prioritise an identifiable operating model and a service you can improve rather than a headline regional growth rate.
| Observed measure | Value | Use in campaign planning |
|---|---|---|
| National net change | +85,130 | Context for market change |
| Employing net change | +2,025 | Separate established-team research |
| WA total count growth | 4.6% | Choose a geography to investigate |
| WA net change | +12,248 | Do not label as ready buyers |
PUT IT TO WORK
RESEARCH FINDING 03
Use industry data to set research priorities
Industry growth helps choose where to investigate; it does not measure the availability of marketing budgets. ABS industry divisions mix many business models. For example, an owner-led maintenance contractor and a large construction group can sit inside the same broad sector. [S01]
The selected changes below are national net changes in business counts during 2025-26. They are not WA growth rates. Health care has the largest increase in this selection, but its regulation, buyer pathways and sensitive information make it a distinct proposition. A specialist should choose it for actual capability, not a large percentage.
For a first advisory campaign, compare the ability to define a valuable offer, access an accountable owner, obtain a usable baseline and deliver a small improvement. Keep sector volume separate from your internal suitability judgement. The workbook includes all 19 national industry changes so readers can examine alternatives without hiding slower-growing sectors.
| National division | Change | Decision to investigate |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | 3.4% | Project mix, quotes and maintenance handover |
| Professional / technical | 3.6% | Service positioning and owner-led sales |
| Administrative / support | 2.6% | Recurring contract and site selection |
| Manufacturing | 0.2% | Capability-led offers and quote discipline |
| Health care / social assistance | 6.7% | Specialist scope and approval requirements |
| Retail | 0.1% | Unit economics and repeat-purchase journey |
PUT IT TO WORK
ORIGINAL PUBLIC-SOURCE RESEARCH
What eight Perth service offers reveal
We reviewed eight named public service pages on 16 October 2026. They were deliberately selected to illustrate repeat or continuing service alongside project work in Perth. This is a purposive example set, not a random market survey. It cannot estimate how common an offer is across WA.
The useful observation is commercial structure. Four electrical examples describe maintenance in addition to project or inspection work. The air-conditioning example separates installation and ongoing servicing. Three cleaning examples show contract-based scope. A growth brief needs to establish which revenue stream the owner wants to build.
These companies are public research examples, not LeadScorer customers, endorsed suppliers or confirmed consulting prospects. No private performance, employee count, consent record, dissatisfaction or purchase intent was established. The downloadable register preserves the source, observed offer and a question to investigate.
| Example | Publicly described work | Advisory question |
|---|---|---|
| KTA / GM / Perth Electrical & Data / ACwest | Electrical projects and maintenance | Which buyer and ongoing scope? |
| Ford & Doonan | Commercial systems and servicing | Which division and service owner? |
| Reset / Precimax / Marlow | Commercial cleaning contracts | Which site profile and contract economics? |
PUT IT TO WORK
SEGMENT SELECTION
Build six campaign cells with different economics
The unit of targeting is a business model inside a practical service area. Perth metro can support local relationships, but location is only the outer boundary. Within it, separate reactive trades, planned maintenance, recurring contracts and specialist professional work.
The six cells below are operating hypotheses, not measured market segments. Start with the cell closest to your strongest delivery experience. Decide what you can assess without confidential access and what would require a paid diagnostic.
Use a one-page comparison before buying contact data: customer type, average job contribution, repeat mechanism, sales cycle, available delivery capacity, owner access and the evidence you can show. Leave unknowns visible. A promising sector with an unprofitable offer should remain out of the launch.
| Campaign cell | Decision for the owner | First asset |
|---|---|---|
| Trade service teams | Reactive jobs or planned maintenance? | Job-mix worksheet |
| Commercial site services | Which sites and contracts fit? | Site-profile comparison |
| Professional service practices | Which service and ideal client? | Offer clarity map |
| Specialist industrial suppliers | Which application and buyer? | Capability-to-buyer brief |
| Established retail / consumer services | Acquire, repeat or reactivate? | Customer-journey map |
| Owner-led B2B firms | What can sales delegate? | Owner-to-team handover |
PUT IT TO WORK
ENTRY PLAY 01
Make positioning observable
A positioning engagement becomes easier to sell when it addresses a buyer choice. Ask what one type of customer should choose the business for, which alternatives they compare, and what the business can prove. A slogan is an output of the decision, not the decision itself.
Review the public offer across the home page, service page and enquiry path. Record the customer named, the job promised, the next action and the evidence provided. A different phrase on two pages can be a question for the owner, but does not prove confused buyers or lost revenue.
In discovery, compare the last ten won enquiries with the last ten declined or lost ones, using records the owner is authorised to share. Keep the time window and inclusion rules. Identify whether poor fit, weak proof, price, response delay or delivery capacity explains the outcome. The sample is a diagnostic starting point, not statistical proof.
| Positioning field | Evidence needed | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Priority customer | Won / lost records and owner choice | Explicit inclusion criteria |
| Valuable job | Buyer language and delivered scope | One offer statement |
| Reason to choose | Approved examples and limits | Relevant proof note |
| Next step | Buyer decision and required input | Bounded call or brief |
PUT IT TO WORK
ENTRY PLAY 02
Sell the right mix of project and recurring work
More enquiries can worsen a business if they arrive for work the owner does not want. A contractor may prefer maintenance agreements to small reactive jobs. A cleaning business may prefer a particular site type or minimum contract. The acquisition brief should reflect that decision.
Ask the owner to separate revenue streams and calculate direct contribution for each using matching cost bases. Include service labour, travel, materials, subcontracting and likely rework where relevant. A recurring contract can still have poor economics or create concentrated delivery risk.
Create a commercial rule for the campaign: named buyer, service scope, minimum viable work and available capacity. Keep one-off quote requests on a quote route and broader recurring decisions on a scoping route. The consultancy should avoid receiving every small enquiry as a full strategy prospect.
| Revenue stream | Measure before growth | Useful entry discussion |
|---|---|---|
| Reactive service | Contribution after travel / dispatch | Which jobs should be accepted? |
| Planned maintenance | Service effort and renewal basis | Which customer profile repeats well? |
| Project installation | Scope, quote effort and delivery slots | Which projects merit pursuit? |
| Contract services | Monthly contribution and staffing | Which scope can be sustained? |
PUT IT TO WORK
ENTRY PLAY 03
Turn quote follow-up into a defined improvement
An enquiry-to-quote review can open a useful growth conversation without pitching a complete rebrand. Choose one service line and map enquiry receipt, qualification, quote issue, follow-up, decision and outcome. Use one identifier for the same enquiry across stages.
Before calculating conversion, define the cohort. Count valid, qualified quotes issued in one period and allow an agreed time for decisions. Keep duplicates, reissued quotes, open decisions and excluded jobs visible. Comparing this month's wins with this month's newly issued quotes can misstate the close rate when sales cycles cross months.
Investigate missing steps rather than assuming poor selling. A quote may wait on drawings, a site visit, a third-party approval or a buyer decision. Assign the next action to a real owner. The consulting deliverable can be a simple process and outcome register with a weekly review.
| Stage | Record | Diagnostic question |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified enquiry | Fit, need and owner | Should this reach quoting? |
| Quote issued | Version, scope and date | Can the buyer compare it? |
| Decision pending | Next action and due date | What is preventing a decision? |
| Won / lost / deferred | Reason and supporting reply | What should change next? |
PUT IT TO WORK
ENTRY PLAY 04
Build repeat demand from a valid customer journey
A repeat-business engagement begins with the service lifecycle. For maintenance, identify the appropriate next service and who is responsible for it. For professional work, identify a recurring review or changed client requirement. For retail, distinguish a relevant repeat purchase from an unrelated cross-sell.
Map eligibility, contact permissions, service timing, message purpose, fulfilment capacity and outcome. A list of past customers is not automatically available for a new marketing campaign. ACMA states that commercial electronic messaging requires consent; a one-off purchase does not by itself establish inferred consent. [S03]
The consultancy can sell a permission-aware journey design and approved implementation. Separate the owner's decision to offer a programme from the right to contact each recipient. Measure additional completed work and contribution over an appropriate comparison period, including opt-outs and delivery effort.
| Journey stage | Working output | Measure |
|---|---|---|
| Eligibility | Service and permission criteria | Eligible records |
| Offer | Relevant scope and terms | Valid responses |
| Delivery | Scheduling and accountable owner | Completed work |
| Review | Matched cohort and cost basis | Incremental contribution |
PUT IT TO WORK
ENTRY PLAY 05
Reduce the owner bottleneck with a measurable brief
Owner time is often the language that makes a growth discussion relevant. Translate it into a workflow: who handles enquiries, approves quotes, explains the offer and makes follow-up decisions. Ask which steps genuinely require the owner and which remain there because the rules are undocumented.
Measure a typical week before proposing savings. Record tasks, counts, time per task, decision authority and rework. Hours released are capacity, not automatic cash savings. A financial saving needs evidence that a real cost is avoided or profitable work can use the capacity.
A bounded engagement could standardise initial qualification, a quote handover and a weekly commercial review. Make the owner responsible for decisions that cannot be delegated, and nominate an implementation owner. Growth advice without that person can become another set of recommendations the owner has no time to use.
| Task | Decision to document | Evidence after change |
|---|---|---|
| New enquiry | Fit and routing criteria | Correctly routed records |
| Quote approval | Value / scope authority | Approval time and rework |
| Follow-up | Next action and timing | Complete decision records |
| Weekly review | Owner vs team decisions | Actions completed |
PUT IT TO WORK
ENTRY PLAY 06
Connect communication and implementation
Some owners have a strategy document, a website, email activity and several suppliers that operate separately. A marketing-touchpoint review can be useful when it asks one question: does each touchpoint support the same buyer decision and lead to a handled next step?
Review a bounded set: one service page, one enquiry route, one approved message and the handover to sales. Identify what is actually visible, what the owner reports and what remains unknown. Public website inspection cannot establish attribution, campaign performance or the quality of private follow-up.
Define who will implement each approved change. Strategy, copy, design, technical changes, campaign operation and reporting can have different owners and fees. When a consultancy also supplies email marketing, keep the acquisition of its own clients separate from the email service it later delivers for them.
| Touchpoint | Review question | Implementation owner |
|---|---|---|
| Service page | Which buyer and outcome? | Owner / strategist |
| Enquiry route | What information and next action? | Sales / operations |
| Approved message | Is the offer and proof consistent? | Marketing owner |
| Follow-up | Who handles the response? | Named sales owner |
PUT IT TO WORK
ACCOUNT RESEARCH
Research owner-led accounts with an evidence trail
Start with the business and its offer. Search its service pages, project examples, location pages and dated announcements. Establish a buying entity, service area, customer type and visible commercial model before looking for a person.
The eight-company register shows the minimum standard: a source URL, observation, research question and date checked. It deliberately does not fill ownership, company size, budgets or agency arrangements from guesswork. A sole director on a register is not necessarily the person managing a growth project.
Use a second source where identity or scope is unclear. Keep similar trading names separate until the buying entity is confirmed. A company with several branches may buy centrally; a franchise may make local decisions. Ask for the correct route rather than approaching every contact at once.
| Field | Acceptable evidence | Do not substitute |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial model | Named service and purchase route | Industry label alone |
| Change signal | Dated first-party announcement | Undated directory text |
| Relevant person | Current role and ownership context | Seniority alone |
| Contact route | Recorded lawful basis and channel | A published address alone |
| Next question | Observation tied to the offer | A guessed performance problem |
PUT IT TO WORK
TIMING AND RELEVANCE
Turn signals into useful owner questions
Use a change only when the source explains what happened and when. A new service, a second location, a commercial project or a changed offer can justify a question about the next growth decision. None proves dissatisfaction with the existing strategy.
Record both the event date and your check date. Set a review date appropriate to the event. A branch opening already completed may no longer support an opening campaign. An old recruitment advert does not prove current growth or spare capacity.
The strength of the approach is the question it earns. Mention one verified fact, ask about one decision and offer one useful asset. If the owner says the issue is handled, accept that information and update the record.
| Observed fact | Question to test | Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| New commercial service announced | Who is the intended first customer? | Demand and budget |
| Project and maintenance offers coexist | Which stream should grow next? | Preferred mix |
| Second location announced | Who owns the local offer and follow-up? | Buying rights |
| New operations role filled | What can the owner delegate next? | Authority and capacity |
| Owner confirms a review date | What decision must the review support? | Approved scope |
PUT IT TO WORK
ACCOUNT GATES
Prioritise research and qualify meetings separately
A research priority score can allocate effort, but cannot confirm a buyer's problem. Apply fit, permitted contact route, suppression and capability gates first. A failed gate stops the record. An unknown required fact keeps it on hold.
For records that pass, use the proposed 0-2 scale below. It is an editable operating rubric, not a model trained on campaign performance. Do not convert its total into a win probability. Check which factors correlate with accepted opportunities once your own outcomes exist.
Keep meeting qualification separate. A high-scoring company may not want a discussion. A smaller company may have a specific, funded decision. The meeting gate requires owner or sponsor relevance, a named topic, informed agreement, fit with your scope and a useful next step.
| Research dimension | 0 | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offer relevance | Unclear | Plausible service match | Specific decision match |
| Evidence | Unsupported | Current public offer | Buyer-confirmed issue |
| Ownership | Unknown | Likely sponsor | Sponsor confirmed |
| Implementation | No path known | Possible owner | Responsible owner agreed |
PUT IT TO WORK
FIRST-CONVERSATION ASSETS
Offer a small decision the owner can use
A useful free asset reduces uncertainty and remains valuable without a purchase. It should also fit a real preparation budget. Choose one of the six worksheets included with this kit and make the input and output clear before the call.
A public offer review can compare buyer, scope, proof and next action. A commercial diagnosis needs owner-approved records. Do not request account credentials, unrestricted customer exports or detailed financial statements just to establish whether a first conversation is useful.
When the question needs interviews, data cleaning, internal analysis or implementation, write a paid scope. State the sample, deliverables, exclusions, client inputs, completion test and fee basis. A clear boundary helps an owner understand the difference between a useful introduction and consulting work.
| Entry asset | Required input | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer-and-offer map | One service and target buyer | No full brand strategy |
| Job-mix worksheet | Approved job categories | No margin estimate without costs |
| Quote-path map | One workflow and owner | No CRM rebuild |
| Repeat-service journey | Eligible lifecycle and permissions | No bulk send |
| Owner handover | One recurring task | No whole-business redesign |
| Touchpoint brief | One offer across four assets | No channel performance audit |
PUT IT TO WORK
EIGHT EDITABLE MESSAGE EXAMPLES
Write outreach around a commercial decision
A useful free asset reduces uncertainty and remains valuable without a purchase. Specify its buyer, output, preparation time and next decision before writing the message. The first request should be small enough for an owner to answer without buying the full engagement.
The templates assume the contact is eligible for the selected channel and every capability statement is true. Add the correct sender identity, contact details and a functional stop-contact route. A free resource offer can still be a commercial message. A contact published online is not blanket permission to send. [S03]
The structure is deliberately simple: context, question, bounded help and a proportionate next step. A reply requesting the worksheet is not an agreement to a sales meeting. Deliver the asset, answer the question and ask whether a relevant discussion would help.
| Message component | Working rule | Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Context | One current, verified fact | Invented growth or dissatisfaction |
| Question | One owner decision | Diagnosis from website appearance |
| Help | A defined worksheet or review | Guaranteed revenue improvement |
| Next step | Send asset or agree purpose | Calendar link without context |
| Follow-up | Add decision-relevant information | False urgency or repeated chasing |
PUT IT TO WORK
MESSAGE SELECTION
Choose the right message and follow-up
Each message has a specific job. An owner considering positioning needs a different opening from an owner reviewing a quote workflow. Use only verified observations, remove placeholders and keep the next step small. The complete editable texts sit immediately after this chapter in the web edition and in Outreach_Templates.txt.
For a live sequence, record the purpose of each touch. A second message can explain the worksheet or show a relevant example. A later message should respect a buyer-stated review date. Do not manufacture an opening announcement, an earlier discussion or a referral.
Use one clear request in each message. Write in plain language, keep sentences short and stay below 100 words including the subject, sender details and opt-out. Budget up to 80 words before the real sender details are inserted. Every line should explain why the next line belongs. A worksheet request is interest in the asset; deliver it and clarify whether a service discussion would help.
| Template | Use when | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Positioning and offer | One buyer / offer decision | Offer map |
| 2. Project and recurring work | Two verified service streams | Job-mix sheet |
| 3. Quote process | Relevant quote workflow | Quote-path sheet |
| 4. Repeat service | Verified repeat-service model | Journey map |
| 5. Owner delegation | Defined commercial task | Handover sheet |
| 6. Referral partner | Permitted partner discussion | Fit criteria |
| 7. After a real worksheet request | Real request received | Deliver the asset |
| 8. Agreed later review | Buyer agreed the timing | Confirm timing |
PUT IT TO WORK
EIGHT OUTREACH MESSAGES
One decision. One useful next step.
These messages are written for a consultancy’s own client acquisition. Use only statements that match your actual services, approved contact routes and real conversation history. Replace every placeholder and add accurate sender details before use.
01Positioning and offer
Subject: the buyer for [service]
Hi [first name],
Your [verified page or announcement] describes [specific service]. Is the priority to win more [buyer type], or are you still deciding which customers that offer should focus on?
We help owners clarify the buyer, offer and proof before building more marketing around it. I can share a one-page offer map if useful.
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Use one verified service page or announcement. Name the actual buyer decision, not an assumed positioning problem.
02Project and recurring work
Subject: [service] projects and maintenance
Hi [first name],
Your site lists both [verified project service] and [verified ongoing service]. Which stream would you most like the next stage of growth to support?
We use a short job-mix worksheet to connect targeting with contribution and delivery capacity. Would a blank copy be useful?
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Use only after verifying both service streams. Do not imply that recurring work is always more profitable.
03Quote process
Subject: the next step after a [service] quote
Hi [first name],
For [relevant service], does your team already have a consistent way to record what happens between quoting and the customer decision?
We help owners map that process and give each next action an owner. A one-page quote-path checklist may be useful if this is on your agenda.
Shall I send it?
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Offer a bounded process review. Public research cannot establish private quote conversion or lost revenue.
04Repeat service
Subject: the next service for [customer type]
Hi [first name],
Your [verified source] includes [ongoing service]. Is the next customer contact driven by a planned service journey, or handled case by case?
We can map eligibility, timing, permissions and ownership before any marketing activity is added. Would the worksheet help you review the process?
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Confirm the repeat-service model. Customer history does not automatically permit a marketing sequence.
05Owner delegation
Subject: who handles [commercial task]?
Hi [first name],
Who owns [specific enquiry, quoting or follow-up task] in the business today?
We work with owners on the rules and handovers that allow a team to handle repeat decisions consistently. The first output is a task-and-decision map.
Is that relevant to something you are reviewing, or should I leave it here?
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Discuss a defined commercial task. Do not diagnose an overwhelmed owner from company size or public information.
06Referral partner
Subject: a useful introduction for [defined service]
Hi [first name],
For owners who [specific situation], we offer [accurate, bounded service]. The useful starting point is [one decision and output].
If that overlaps with a business you already support, would you be open to reviewing the fit criteria? Any introduction would be with their knowledge and agreement.
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Check the partner’s fit and permitted contact route. Do not invent a referral or suggest an established relationship.
07After a real worksheet request
Subject: the [worksheet] you asked for
Hi [first name],
Here is the [worksheet or link] you requested. Start with [one concrete step]. You can use it with your team as it stands.
If it exposes a decision you would like help with, a short discussion can focus on [specific scope]. No need to prepare a full business presentation.
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Only after a real worksheet request. Supply the promised asset; interest in a worksheet is not meeting consent.
08Agreed later review
Subject: your [confirmed period] review
Hi [first name],
You asked me to return in [confirmed period] about [agreed topic]. Is that review still on your agenda?
The useful first decision would be [specific decision]. I can resend the worksheet or leave it with you if the timing has changed.
[Sender name, business and contact details] Prefer no further messages? Reply to let me know.
When this message fits
Only after an agreed later review. Keep the actual timing and previous conversation accurate.
Keep the final message under 100 words including subject, sender details and opt-out; shorten the draft after inserting real details. No universal sending cadence or response benchmark is implied.
Download all eight editable messages →DISCOVERY AND ACCEPTANCE
Make a first meeting worth the owner's time
An accepted first discussion needs a suitable business, a relevant sponsor, a named commercial topic and informed agreement to the purpose. It does not require a fully costed implementation plan before discovery. Keep meeting acceptance separate from proposal readiness.
Use the first 25 minutes to understand one decision. Ask what the owner wants to change, what the current process looks like, what evidence exists and who will implement an agreed action. Clarify the consequence of doing nothing without amplifying fear.
Close with a decision: no fit, more information, a paid diagnostic, a proposal or an agreed later review. A friendly conversation is not a qualified opportunity unless there is a defined need, sponsor and credible next commercial step.
| Minutes | Focus | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 0-5 | Owner goal and decision | A clear objective |
| 5-12 | Current workflow and baseline | Facts and unknowns |
| 12-18 | Impact, constraints and capacity | Commercial context |
| 18-22 | Sponsor, inputs and implementation | Responsible people |
| 22-25 | Next decision and owner | Agreed action and date |
PUT IT TO WORK
THE REPLY DESK
Turn a useful reply into an agreed next step
A positive reply needs a named owner and a recorded next action. Separate interest in the worksheet from interest in the service. Answer the actual request first, then ask the one question needed to decide whether a discussion would help.
Proposed operating target: acknowledge or answer high-intent replies within five staffed minutes. Measure the time to a useful human response separately from automatic acknowledgement. Assign a backup and publish staffed hours; this is an internal service target, not a measured conversion benchmark.
For individual strategic accounts, verify the offer against the current website and relevant professional profile. For a repeatable campaign, use a narrow segment with checked fields. Missing evidence holds the record. The relevance should come from the customer, service and decision, not an unrelated compliment.
| Reply type | Owner action | Record |
|---|---|---|
| Wants a discussion | Confirm purpose and offer two real time options with timezone | Sponsor, topic and explicit agreement |
| Requests the worksheet | Send it before asking another question | Asset delivered; service interest still unknown |
| Asks about price or scope | Answer within the true scope; identify the missing input | Question answered and next decision |
| Says later | Use the buyer's stated date and allowed contact route | Review date, topic and permission |
| Refers another person | Confirm a suitable introduction or authorised route | New contact evidence; no assumed consent |
| Declines or asks to stop | Close or suppress across the account and tools | Stop reason and completed action |
PUT IT TO WORK
After an owner agrees to meet, keep the purpose, useful preparation, reminders and rescheduling route connected to the same record. Record attendance separately from sales acceptance. Use the appointment-nurturing playbooks →
WORKED EXAMPLE: CLIENT ECONOMICS
Model client value without multiplying promises
The following monthly example is fictional. An owner issues 80 qualified quotes, wins 30%, invoices AUD 2,500 per job and incurs AUD 1,750 of direct cost per job. Baseline expected jobs are 24 and direct contribution is AUD 18,000. These are assumptions for arithmetic, not observed sector benchmarks.
Test one mechanism first. If close rate becomes 35% with the same quote volume, four additional jobs fit within an assumed six spare delivery slots. At unchanged unit economics, incremental direct contribution is AUD 3,000. Deduct AUD 1,800 advisory and implementation fees plus AUD 200 additional fixed implementation cost: AUD 1,000 remains before shared overhead and tax.
A price change is a separate mechanism. Test its effect on close rate, direct costs and capacity rather than stacking assumed improvements. Model the combined future state once against one baseline. Do not add separately calculated conversion and pricing uplifts if the same jobs appear in both.
| Monthly measure | Baseline | Illustrative change |
|---|---|---|
| Qualified quotes | 80 | 80 |
| Close rate | 30% | 35% |
| Expected completed jobs | 24 | 28 |
| Contribution / job | AUD 750 | AUD 750 |
| Incremental direct contribution | - | AUD 3,000 |
| Net incremental amount | - | AUD 1,000 |
PUT IT TO WORK
Apply this chapter in the planning tool →WORKED EXAMPLE: CONSULTANCY ECONOMICS
Set fees against delivery and acquisition effort
A practice can create a crowded diary while losing money on preparation and proposals. Include data, outreach, sales time and delivery effort when judging a campaign. Price the work on its actual scope and contribution, rather than the prospect's total revenue.
Fictional cohort: 200 eligible accounts generate 12 positive account replies, six meetings booked, five held, four accepted held meetings and one signed diagnostic. At AUD 3,000 fully loaded acquisition cost, the cost per accepted held meeting is AUD 750 and acquisition cost per signed diagnostic is AUD 3,000. These ratios describe the fictional completed cohort; they are not a forecast.
A separate illustrative planning model uses an AUD 4,500 diagnostic fee and AUD 1,800 direct delivery cost. Contribution before acquisition is AUD 2,700 per diagnostic. At an assumed 25% win probability per accepted meeting, expected diagnostic contribution is AUD 675 per accepted meeting. That is below the fictional cohort's AUD 750 cost. A future retainer must be supported by a separate conversion and delivery case, not added at full contract value.
| Metric | Calculation | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Cost / accepted held | 3,000 / 4 | AUD 750 |
| Diagnostic contribution | 4,500 - 1,800 | AUD 2,700 |
| Expected contribution / meeting | 2,700 x 25% | AUD 675 |
| Gap before overhead | 675 - 750 | AUD -75 / meeting |
PUT IT TO WORK
Apply this chapter in the planning tool →CAPACITY AND LAUNCH
Protect delivery and implementation capacity
A strategy practice has several queues: research, replies, owner calls, preparation, diagnostics, implementation and reviews. Growth is viable only if those stages can absorb the work. Use observed task times where available, and label planning assumptions when they are not.
Illustrative fortnight: six first calls at one hour including preparation, three proposal reviews at two hours and two diagnostics at eight hours require 28 hours. If 20 productive delivery and sales hours are available, the workload exceeds capacity by eight hours. More booked calls would add pressure without resolving the constraint.
Set a release rate for new accounts and a cap for free preparation. During a first 30-day test, choose the cell and offer, verify a small account batch, run approved outreach, handle replies and review accepted conversations. The plan is a learning cycle; a consultancy sale can take longer.
| Phase | Work | Exit evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Days 1-5 | Choose segment, offer and scope | Approved campaign brief |
| Days 6-10 | Research and verify first batch | Traceable account records |
| Days 11-20 | Outreach and asset delivery | Real replies and routing |
| Days 21-30 | Discovery and commercial review | Written continue / change / stop decision |
PUT IT TO WORK
Apply this chapter in the planning tool →DEFINITIONS AND EXPERIMENTS
Measure the whole acquisition path
Use a cohort keyed to when an account first enters the campaign. Track accounts, positive replies, booked meetings, held meetings, accepted held meetings, scoped diagnostics, proposals, signed work and collections. Keep reschedules linked to the same meeting record.
Choose one test variable and one primary measure. If comparing two entry assets, keep the segment, eligibility rules and review period aligned. Report counts beside rates. A small difference from a handful of replies is a reason to investigate, not proof that one message is superior.
Use client feedback to improve the system. A rejected meeting should have a reason: wrong service, no sponsor, unclear purpose, no implementation owner or commercial mismatch. Those reasons tell you whether to change research, qualification, messaging or scope. Downloads and worksheet completions remain resource activity until a real buying conversation establishes more.
| Metric | Definition | Denominator |
|---|---|---|
| Positive account reply | Unique account gives relevant interest | Eligible accounts reached |
| Attendance | First meetings actually held | First meetings due |
| Acceptance | Held meetings meeting written criteria | Held meetings |
| Diagnostic win rate | Signed diagnostics from accepted cohort | Accepted held meetings |
| Acquisition cost | Fully loaded cohort cost | Signed clients or accepted meetings |
PUT IT TO WORK
EVIDENCE, PERMISSIONS AND FINAL CHECKLIST
Run a credible advisory acquisition programme
Separate four evidence types throughout the programme: official population data, observed public company facts, buyer-reported information and model assumptions. Anonymised case evidence needs a genuine underlying project and appropriate approval. Public research examples are not past client work.
Australian commercial electronic messages require a documented consent basis, accurate sender identification and an unsubscribe route. You cannot send a marketing message simply to request consent. Purchased data does not remove the sender's responsibilities. Privacy and Do Not Call requirements depend on the entity and channel; check the relevant guidance before launch. [S03] [S04]
Use ATO benchmarks only with the matching industry, turnover range, definitions and data year. They are a comparison aid, not proof of an owner's inefficiency, private profit or marketing performance. This guide supplies no universal conversion, margin or improvement benchmark. [S05]
| Before launch | Required output |
|---|---|
| Segment and offer | One defined owner decision |
| Research | Sources, dates and unknowns |
| Contact route | Permission and suppression records |
| Meeting | Sponsor, purpose and informed agreement |
| Commercial model | Fees, costs and capacity |
| Delivery | Implementation owner and acceptance test |
| Review | Cohort outcomes and next decision |